Back to the books
Okay, so I haven't been a perfect soldier - I missed a few days of blogging. I think I will have to allow myself time off on weekends.
So now that the big pregnancy extravaganza seems to have blown over, I'd like to re-focus my mind on science once again. Becoming a parent still takes up a substantial amount of thought time in my brain, but I don't want to expend all my mental energy on that thought.
Perhaps I'll try to start each workday with a blog to gather my thoughts together and lay out my scientific plans for the day.
PA and I have talked about this newish technique that applies to our field, and I am trying to think about it in the back of my mind to see if I can come up with any neat projects that could make use of this technology. I generally conceptualize projects from a compuational stand-point, as I have little to no wet-lab experience. I remember reading that academics (this advice was directed to mathematicians specifically, but can be applied more broadly) should keep their top 10 dream projects in the back of their mind, and every time they learn a new technique, they should mentally check if that technique would be of any use to their top 10. Typically it won't, but once in a blue moon, one will stick, and then you can have some advancement on your dream project, and other people will wonder "How did you ever come up with that solution?"
Maybe I'll have an "epiphany" of my own someday.
In the mean time I have some long standing interests in a related field of my own, and more generally in the big questions of "origins." I'm not all that interested in the origin of life itself, as I recognize that is probably too tricky for most of the methods I use - and I actually think that it was so stochastic a beginning that we wouldn't have all that much to learn from resolving that particular puzzle. I may be naive for thinking this way - but I just find myself more interested in synthetic biology or astrobiology than resolving the actual origin of life on our planet.
I think part of why these "big questions" appeal to me has to do with my mathematics training. I like knowing that there is an actual answer. There is only one true history, and knowing that somehow makes the effort for discovering the truth worthwhile. It may turn out that the sequences we have available to us today are too saturated and noisy to reach that far back in time, but knowing that there still is a real answer out there is satisfying.
But for now I need to continue some reading, to see what has been thought of already, and to mentally apply those techniques to my top 10 list. Oh, and I need to practice my talk for the conference this weekend. And hopefully I will hear back from the editor about my manuscript that is out for review - fingers crossed that it will be accepted for publication!